Skip to content
OverviewSolutions
5
Comments
4
Chantal Ngwenya
@ChantalNgwenya

All comments

  • Chantal Ngwenya•60
    @ChantalNgwenyaPosted about 2 months ago

    Hey @sneha-SE

    Semantic HTML:

    • Strengths: The HTML structure is clear and follows a logical flow with semantic elements like <h1>, <h2>, <ul>, and <p>. These tags improve both readability and accessibility.
    • Improvements: Adding more semantic tags like <article> around the recipe section or <section> around different recipe parts (ingredients, instructions, nutrition) would help structure the document better and make it more accessible. Additionally, using <figure> for the image with an accompanying <figcaption> would semantically describe the image.

    Accessibility:

    • Strengths: The use of alt text for the image is good, though it could be more descriptive (e.g., "Image of omelette").
    • Improvements: Consider adding aria-labels or aria-describedby attributes for interactive elements like buttons or lists, especially if screen readers are used. The color contrast between the text and background (e.g., the grey text on the white background) could be improved for readability, especially for visually impaired users. Using a tool like a contrast checker would help ensure compliance with WCAG standards.

    Layout and Responsiveness:

    • Strengths: The layout is simple and works well for larger screens, and the CSS media queries handle smaller screens reasonably well.
    • Improvements: The recipe container is quite large (width: 50rem, height: 120rem), which might be too wide and long for smaller laptop screens. It would be helpful to add more flexible width handling (e.g., max-width: 100% and height: auto). Additionally, the mobile design could use more padding or spacing to avoid the content feeling cramped on very small screens. Testing on different devices or using a tool like Chrome DevTools for responsiveness would give better insights.

    Code Structure, Readability, and Reusability:

    • Strengths: The CSS is generally well-structured with clear and consistent naming conventions. The use of variables for colors (--White, --Stone-100, etc.) enhances reusability.
    • Improvements: The code could be further improved by grouping related styles into reusable classes or components, for example, defining a common button or list style that can be applied throughout. Also, some CSS prefixes (-webkit-, -moz-) may no longer be necessary in modern browsers, so testing for cross-browser compatibility could simplify the code.

    Design Consistency:

    • Strengths: The design overall looks clean, and the typography choices (e.g., Young Serif for headers) match the expected aesthetic for a recipe page.
    • Improvements: If the solution differs from the design provided by the challenge, it's important to note how well the implementation stays true to the original. For example, is the spacing, font size, and alignment consistent? The use of 3rem for the heading might be larger than expected, and it would be worth comparing this against the design specification.

    Additional Suggestions:

    • Alt Text: Make the alt text for the image more descriptive, e.g., "A simple omelette served on a plate."
    • Consistent Styling: Some properties like -webkit-border-radius, -moz-border-radius, and others can be simplified as modern browsers no longer require prefixes for border-radius. This could help clean up the CSS.
    • Animation: Adding subtle hover effects or transitions could enhance the user experience, especially for elements like the recipe steps or ingredients.

    Overall, the solution is quite solid but could benefit from some minor adjustments in responsiveness, accessibility, and simplifying the CSS. Keep up the great work!

    Semantic HTML:

    • Strengths: The HTML structure is clear and follows a logical flow with semantic elements like <h1>, <h2>, <ul>, and <p>. These tags improve both readability and accessibility.
    • Improvements: Adding more semantic tags like <article> around the recipe section or <section> around different recipe parts (ingredients, instructions, nutrition) would help structure the document better and make it more accessible. Additionally, using <figure> for the image with an accompanying <figcaption> would semantically describe the image.

    Accessibility:

    • Strengths: The use of alt text for the image is good, though it could be more descriptive (e.g., "Image of omelette").
    • Improvements: Consider adding aria-labels or aria-describedby attributes for interactive elements like buttons or lists, especially if screen readers are used. The color contrast between the text and background (e.g., the grey text on the white background) could be improved for readability, especially for visually impaired users. Using a tool like a contrast checker would help ensure compliance with WCAG standards.

    Layout and Responsiveness:

    • Strengths: The layout is simple and works well for larger screens, and the CSS media queries handle smaller screens reasonably well.
    • Improvements: The recipe container is quite large (width: 50rem, height: 120rem), which might be too wide and long for smaller laptop screens. It would be helpful to add more flexible width handling (e.g., max-width: 100% and height: auto). Additionally, the mobile design could use more padding or spacing to avoid the content feeling cramped on very small screens. Testing on different devices or using a tool like Chrome DevTools for responsiveness would give better insights.

    Code Structure, Readability, and Reusability:

    • Strengths: The CSS is generally well-structured with clear and consistent naming conventions. The use of variables for colors (--White, --Stone-100, etc.) enhances reusability.
    • Improvements: The code could be further improved by grouping related styles into reusable classes or components, for example, defining a common button or list style that can be applied throughout. Also, some CSS prefixes (-webkit-, -moz-) may no longer be necessary in modern browsers, so testing for cross-browser compatibility could simplify the code.

    Design Consistency:

    • Strengths: The design overall looks clean, and the typography choices (e.g., Young Serif for headers) match the expected aesthetic for a recipe page.
    • Improvements: If the solution differs from the design provided by the challenge, it's important to note how well the implementation stays true to the original. For example, is the spacing, font size, and alignment consistent? The use of 3rem for the heading might be larger than expected, and it would be worth comparing this against the design specification.

    Additional Suggestions:

    • Alt Text: Make the alt text for the image more descriptive, e.g., "A simple omelette served on a plate."
    • Consistent Styling: Some properties like -webkit-border-radius, -moz-border-radius, and others can be simplified as modern browsers no longer require prefixes for border-radius. This could help clean up the CSS.
    • Animation: Adding subtle hover effects or transitions could enhance the user experience, especially for elements like the recipe steps or ingredients.
    0
  • Chantal Ngwenya•60
    @ChantalNgwenyaPosted about 2 months ago

    Hey @SkMojid

    1. Semantic HTML:

    • Your HTML structure is mostly semantic, but there are a couple of improvements you can make:
      • Instead of using a <div class="hero"> around the image, consider using a more descriptive HTML5 element like <figure> and <figcaption>. This will help associate the image with the content more clearly.
      • The <header> and <footer> tags are used well, but the social links inside the footer could be placed within a <nav> element for better semantic structure, as they represent navigation links.

    2. Accessibility:

    • Alt Text: The alt text for the image is set to "Sk Mojid," but it should describe the person in the image (e.g., "Portrait of Jessica Randall") to be more meaningful to screen readers.
    • Color Contrast: Your colors are mostly accessible, but you might want to double-check the contrast between the grey background (--Grey-700) and the white text. Tools like WebAIM can help ensure that the contrast ratio meets accessibility standards (minimum ratio of 4.5:1 for small text).
    • Focus States: Ensure that interactive elements like the social links have clear focus states. You can add :focus styles along with your :hover styles to improve keyboard navigation accessibility.

    3. Responsive Design:

    • The layout looks well-suited for small screens due to the defined width (310px) of the main element. However, it's important to test how this layout adapts to larger screen sizes. Currently, the design seems optimized for mobile or small devices but might need media queries to adjust for larger viewports.
    • Consider using max-width instead of width for the main element to allow for flexibility across different screen sizes.

    4. Code Structure and Readability:

    • Your CSS is well-structured, and the use of variables makes it easier to maintain and change the design later. One minor suggestion would be to format the variable names consistently (--Grey-700 and --Green use different capitalization conventions).
    • In terms of reusability, your code is fairly modular, but you might want to consider breaking down the social links into a reusable component, especially if the project grows and you have multiple pages.
    • The CSS selector for li:hover a could be optimized for readability by nesting a inside li:hover. This avoids potential confusion about the relationship between elements.

    5. Design Consistency:

    • The overall design looks close to the expected structure, but there are a few areas that might need minor adjustments:
      • The social links are center-aligned, which fits the profile card style, but ensure that this layout remains consistent across screen sizes.
      • The font size for different sections (e.g., h2 and p) looks appropriate for mobile screens, but you might want to use media queries to scale the text size for larger screens.

    Suggestions for Improvement:

    • Add ARIA attributes to improve accessibility, especially for navigation links. For example, you can add aria-label to the social links for better screen reader support.
    • Add more media queries to enhance the responsive design on different screen sizes. This will allow the card to adapt gracefully to larger screens.
    • Font family fallback: Consider adding a fallback font family to your font-family: Inter in case the Google Fonts API fails to load the font.
    2
  • Chantal Ngwenya•60
    @ChantalNgwenyaPosted about 2 months ago

    Feedback for Stephen-Salano's Solution

    1. Semantic HTML:

    • The HTML structure includes semantic elements, such as <main> and <header>, which improves the document’s accessibility and SEO. However, consider using a <figure> element for the QR code image, as it provides more context. You can wrap the image in a <figure> tag and use a <figcaption> for a description if needed.

    2. Accessibility:

    • The alt attribute for the QR code image is generic ("qr-code"). It would be better to provide a more descriptive alt text, such as "QR code linking to Frontend Mentor", to give screen reader users clearer information about the image.
    • Consider adding aria-labels or roles for better screen reader support, particularly for interactive elements, if you plan to expand the functionality.

    3. Responsive Layout:

    • The layout looks good on a range of screen sizes due to the use of Flexbox and media queries. The maximum widths for the container on smaller screens are well defined, ensuring it remains visually appealing.
    • You might also want to test the layout on various devices or use tools like Chrome's DevTools to simulate different screen sizes.

    4. Code Structure and Readability:

    • The code is generally well-structured and readable. Using IDs for styling is fine, but consider switching to class selectors for better reusability. IDs can only be used once per page, while classes can be reused, making your styles more flexible.
    • You might also consider organizing your CSS properties in a consistent order (e.g., layout properties first, followed by typography, colors, etc.) for improved readability.

    5. Alignment with Design:

    • The solution seems to align well with the expected design. The use of colors and fonts matches the provided specifications. Make sure to double-check against the design mockup to ensure there are no discrepancies, especially regarding spacing and alignment.

    Overall, this is a solid implementation! With a few tweaks for accessibility and code structure, it could be even better. Great job!

    0
  • Chiefopoku•70
    @ChiefopokuSubmitted 8 months ago
    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    I was able to complete this challenge using much less time than I did in my first challenge.

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    I could not style the shadow properly and I still need more refinement on using margins and paddings

    What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

    I need help with paddings and margins. Any other tips on increasing my speed with challenges as well as improvements in the readability of my css

    qr code component html responsive css challenge

    1
    Chantal Ngwenya•60
    @ChantalNgwenyaPosted about 2 months ago

    Here’s some feedback on the solution, focusing on HTML semantics, accessibility, layout, and code structure:

    1. Semantic HTML:

    • Strengths: The use of the <main> element is good because it helps establish the primary content of the page.
    • Opportunities for improvement:
      • The <header> and <footer> tags are included but empty. If there’s no content in these sections, you can either remove them or add content to make the structure complete.
      • It’s important to use semantic tags like <section> or <article> for the distinct content inside the <main> instead of relying only on <div> elements. For example, the heading and paragraph could be grouped inside an <article> or <section> for better semantic meaning.
      • The alt text for the image is a bit vague. A more descriptive alt text such as "QR code linking to Frontend Mentor website" would provide more context for users with screen readers.

    Suggestion:

    <article class="card">
  <div class="image-container">
    <img class="image" src="./images/image-qr-code.png" height="288" alt="QR code linking to Frontend Mentor website">
  </div>
  <section class="text">
    <h1>Improve your front-end skills by building projects</h1>
    <p>Scan the QR code to visit Frontend Mentor and take your coding skills to the next level.</p>
  </section>
</article>

    2. Accessibility:

    • Strengths: The page is simple and clean, which is good for accessibility.
    • Opportunities for improvement:
      • Ensure there is a clear focus state for interactive elements like links (if any) to make it easier for keyboard users to navigate.
      • There’s no <meta> description, which is important for search engines and screen readers. Add a description to give more context about the page’s content.

    Suggestion:

    <meta name="description" content="Scan the QR code to visit Frontend Mentor and take your coding skills to the next level.">

    3. Layout and Responsiveness:

    • Strengths: The layout appears to be simple and structured, and the image uses a fixed height which works well.
    • Opportunities for improvement:
      • Ensure the layout works well on smaller screen sizes by testing it with different device widths. Make sure the text and image scale appropriately, and add media queries if necessary.
      • Instead of hardcoding the image’s height, you might want to make it more responsive by using percentages or max-width. This will allow the image to resize better on different devices.

    Suggestion:

    .image {
  max-width: 100%;
  height: auto;
}

    4. Code Structure and Reusability:

    • Strengths: The code is fairly well-structured and simple, which is great for readability.
    • Opportunities for improvement:
      • Consolidate redundant <div> elements. For instance, the separate heading and paragraph divs inside the text div aren’t necessary, and the structure can be simplified.
      • Consider using CSS classes that reflect the content more descriptively. For instance, naming the card something more specific like qr-card would make the purpose of the class clearer.

    Suggestion:

    <section class="qr-card">
  <!-- No need for extra divs -->
  <img src="./images/image-qr-code.png" alt="QR code linking to Frontend Mentor website">
  <h1>Improve your front-end skills by building projects</h1>
  <p>Scan the QR code to visit Frontend Mentor and take your coding skills to the next level.</p>
</section>

    5. Consistency with the Design:

    • Ensure that the design follows the challenge’s specifications, including:
      • Font sizes and colors
      • Padding, margin, and spacing between elements
      • Alignment and positioning of text and images
      • Responsive behavior on mobile devices

    Test the layout with tools like Chrome DevTools to see how it behaves across different screen sizes.

    Overall Recommendations:

    • Improve semantic structure by using <section>, <article>, and removing unnecessary <div> elements.
    • Focus on accessibility with proper alt text, meta descriptions, and interactive element focus states.
    • Test the responsiveness of the layout on various screen sizes and ensure it’s flexible with CSS percentages or relative units like em or rem.
    • Simplify the code for better readability and maintainability.

    With these tweaks, the project will be more robust, accessible, and aligned with best practices for web development!

    Marked as helpful
    1