responsive design using media queries

Community feedback

• 

  Chantal Ngwenya•60

  @ChantalNgwenyaPosted 2 months ago

  Hey @sneha-SE

  Semantic HTML:

  • Strengths: The HTML structure is clear and follows a logical flow with semantic elements like <h1>, <h2>, <ul>, and <p>. These tags improve both readability and accessibility.
  • Improvements: Adding more semantic tags like <article> around the recipe section or <section> around different recipe parts (ingredients, instructions, nutrition) would help structure the document better and make it more accessible. Additionally, using <figure> for the image with an accompanying <figcaption> would semantically describe the image.

  Accessibility:

  • Strengths: The use of alt text for the image is good, though it could be more descriptive (e.g., "Image of omelette").
  • Improvements: Consider adding aria-labels or aria-describedby attributes for interactive elements like buttons or lists, especially if screen readers are used. The color contrast between the text and background (e.g., the grey text on the white background) could be improved for readability, especially for visually impaired users. Using a tool like a contrast checker would help ensure compliance with WCAG standards.

  Layout and Responsiveness:

  • Strengths: The layout is simple and works well for larger screens, and the CSS media queries handle smaller screens reasonably well.
  • Improvements: The recipe container is quite large (width: 50rem, height: 120rem), which might be too wide and long for smaller laptop screens. It would be helpful to add more flexible width handling (e.g., max-width: 100% and height: auto). Additionally, the mobile design could use more padding or spacing to avoid the content feeling cramped on very small screens. Testing on different devices or using a tool like Chrome DevTools for responsiveness would give better insights.

  Code Structure, Readability, and Reusability:

  • Strengths: The CSS is generally well-structured with clear and consistent naming conventions. The use of variables for colors (--White, --Stone-100, etc.) enhances reusability.
  • Improvements: The code could be further improved by grouping related styles into reusable classes or components, for example, defining a common button or list style that can be applied throughout. Also, some CSS prefixes (-webkit-, -moz-) may no longer be necessary in modern browsers, so testing for cross-browser compatibility could simplify the code.

  Design Consistency:

  • Strengths: The design overall looks clean, and the typography choices (e.g., Young Serif for headers) match the expected aesthetic for a recipe page.
  • Improvements: If the solution differs from the design provided by the challenge, it's important to note how well the implementation stays true to the original. For example, is the spacing, font size, and alignment consistent? The use of 3rem for the heading might be larger than expected, and it would be worth comparing this against the design specification.

  Additional Suggestions:

  • Alt Text: Make the alt text for the image more descriptive, e.g., "A simple omelette served on a plate."
  • Consistent Styling: Some properties like -webkit-border-radius, -moz-border-radius, and others can be simplified as modern browsers no longer require prefixes for border-radius. This could help clean up the CSS.
  • Animation: Adding subtle hover effects or transitions could enhance the user experience, especially for elements like the recipe steps or ingredients.

  Overall, the solution is quite solid but could benefit from some minor adjustments in responsiveness, accessibility, and simplifying the CSS. Keep up the great work!

  Semantic HTML:

  • Strengths: The HTML structure is clear and follows a logical flow with semantic elements like <h1>, <h2>, <ul>, and <p>. These tags improve both readability and accessibility.
  • Improvements: Adding more semantic tags like <article> around the recipe section or <section> around different recipe parts (ingredients, instructions, nutrition) would help structure the document better and make it more accessible. Additionally, using <figure> for the image with an accompanying <figcaption> would semantically describe the image.

  Accessibility:

  • Strengths: The use of alt text for the image is good, though it could be more descriptive (e.g., "Image of omelette").
  • Improvements: Consider adding aria-labels or aria-describedby attributes for interactive elements like buttons or lists, especially if screen readers are used. The color contrast between the text and background (e.g., the grey text on the white background) could be improved for readability, especially for visually impaired users. Using a tool like a contrast checker would help ensure compliance with WCAG standards.

  Layout and Responsiveness:

  • Strengths: The layout is simple and works well for larger screens, and the CSS media queries handle smaller screens reasonably well.
  • Improvements: The recipe container is quite large (width: 50rem, height: 120rem), which might be too wide and long for smaller laptop screens. It would be helpful to add more flexible width handling (e.g., max-width: 100% and height: auto). Additionally, the mobile design could use more padding or spacing to avoid the content feeling cramped on very small screens. Testing on different devices or using a tool like Chrome DevTools for responsiveness would give better insights.

  Code Structure, Readability, and Reusability:

  • Strengths: The CSS is generally well-structured with clear and consistent naming conventions. The use of variables for colors (--White, --Stone-100, etc.) enhances reusability.
  • Improvements: The code could be further improved by grouping related styles into reusable classes or components, for example, defining a common button or list style that can be applied throughout. Also, some CSS prefixes (-webkit-, -moz-) may no longer be necessary in modern browsers, so testing for cross-browser compatibility could simplify the code.

  Design Consistency:

  • Strengths: The design overall looks clean, and the typography choices (e.g., Young Serif for headers) match the expected aesthetic for a recipe page.
  • Improvements: If the solution differs from the design provided by the challenge, it's important to note how well the implementation stays true to the original. For example, is the spacing, font size, and alignment consistent? The use of 3rem for the heading might be larger than expected, and it would be worth comparing this against the design specification.

  Additional Suggestions:

  • Alt Text: Make the alt text for the image more descriptive, e.g., "A simple omelette served on a plate."
  • Consistent Styling: Some properties like -webkit-border-radius, -moz-border-radius, and others can be simplified as modern browsers no longer require prefixes for border-radius. This could help clean up the CSS.
  • Animation: Adding subtle hover effects or transitions could enhance the user experience, especially for elements like the recipe steps or ingredients.

  0