1.The solution uses semantic HTML effectively for about 80% of the content. There is room for improvement in the remaining 20% to enhance clarity and accessibility.
2.yes, and improvement is the upper margin it can be added
1.The solution uses semantic HTML effectively for about 80% of the content. There is room for improvement in the remaining 20% to enhance clarity and accessibility.
2.As mentioned, there is a 20% area that can be improved. Specifically, adjusting the card heights to prevent inner content from being congested would enhance the user experience.
3.The layout looks good across a range of screen sizes, ensuring a consistent and visually appealing user experience
4.The CSS could be more organized and easier to understand. Some parts are a bit confusing and would benefit from refactoring for better readability and reusability.
5.The solution matches the design closely, with about 80% accuracy. There are some discrepancies, but overall it maintains the intended look and feel.