Skip to content
OverviewSolutions
3
Comments
3
Stephen
@Codestephenn

All comments

  • Mazen Hassan•600
    @Mazz100Submitted 10 months ago

    A quick refreshing challenge before starting a React project soon

    Any feedback is welcome 😃

    Social Link Profile

    1
    Stephen•70
    @CodestephennPosted 3 months ago

    Hello Here's my review of your project:

    Semantic HTML: Yes, your solution uses semantic HTML elements, which is great for accessibility and SEO.

    Accessibility:

    • You've used ARIA attributes and semantic elements, which is excellent.
    • Consider adding alt text to the profile image for screen readers.
    • The color contrast between the background and text could be improved for better readability.

    Layout and Responsiveness:

    • The layout looks good on a range of screen sizes, but consider adding more media queries for smaller screens.
    • The card's fixed width might cause issues on smaller screens; consider using a more flexible layout approach.

    Code Structure and Readability:

    • Your CSS is well-structured and easy to read.
    • Consider grouping related styles together (e.g., all .social-links styles) for better organization.
    • Use consistent naming conventions for classes and IDs.

    Design Comparison:

    • Your solution closely matches the design, but some minor adjustments could be made to perfect the layout and spacing.

    Overall, great job on this project! With some minor improvements, it can be even more accessible, responsive, and maintainable. Keep up the good work!

    1
  • Stephen•70
    @CodestephennPosted 3 months ago

    Semantic HTML: The HTML structure is well-organized and uses semantic elements like <main>, <div class="card">, and <div class="detail">. However, consider using more specific semantic elements like <article> for the card content and <header> for the author section.

    Accessibility:

    • The images have alt attributes, which is great for screen readers.
    • Consider adding ARIA attributes to the card and author elements to improve screen reader navigation.
    • The color contrast between the background and text could be improved for better readability.
    • The hover effect on the heading could be improved for keyboard navigation.

    Layout and Responsiveness:

    • The layout looks good on a range of screen sizes, but consider adding more media queries to adjust the font sizes and spacing for smaller screens.
    • The card's fixed width and height might cause issues on smaller screens; consider using a more flexible layout approach.

    Code Structure and Readability:

    • The CSS is well-structured and easy to read.
    • Consider grouping related styles together (e.g., all .card styles) for better organization.
    • Use consistent naming conventions for classes and IDs.

    Design Comparison:

    • The solution closely matches the design, but some minor adjustments could be made to perfect the layout and spacing.

    Overall, great job on this project! With some minor improvements, it can be even more accessible, responsive, and maintainable. Keep up the good work!

    Marked as helpful
    0
  • Stephen•70
    @CodestephennPosted 3 months ago

    Semantic HTML: The HTML structure is well-organized and uses semantic elements like <div class="container"> and <div class="content">. However, consider using more specific semantic elements like <main>, <section>, or <article> to define the content structure.

    Accessibility:

    • The image has an alt attribute, which is great for screen readers.

    Layout and Responsiveness:

    • The container's absolute positioning might cause issues on smaller screens; consider using a more flexible layout approach.

    Code Structure and Readability:

    • The CSS is well-structured and easy to read.
    • Consider grouping related styles together (e.g., all .container styles) for better organization.

    Design Comparison:

    • The solution closely matches the design, but some minor adjustments could be made to perfect the layout and spacing.

    Overall, great job on this project! With some minor improvements, it can be even more accessible, responsive, and maintainable. Keep up the good work!

    Marked as helpful
    0