
Design comparison
Community feedback
- P@AlejandroCavitaPosted 8 days ago
Does the solution include semantic HTML?
Yes, the solution includes semantic HTML. I used appropriate HTML5 tags such as
<article>
,<header>
,<footer>
, and<section>
to structure the content meaningfully. This improves the accessibility and SEO of the webpage.Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made?
The solution is partially accessible. I ensured that the text has sufficient contrast and used semantic HTML to improve accessibility. However, there are areas for improvement:
- Adding ARIA labels to interactive elements for better screen reader support.
- Ensuring all interactive elements are keyboard navigable.
- Providing alternative text for images to describe their content.
Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes?
Yes, the layout looks good on a range of screen sizes. I adopted a mobile-first approach and used media queries to adjust the design for larger screens. The card layout adapts seamlessly from mobile devices to desktop screens, ensuring a consistent user experience.
Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable?
The code is well-structured, readable, and reusable. I used CSS custom properties to maintain consistency in styles and organized the CSS rules logically. The use of Flexbox and media queries is clear and easy to follow. Additionally, I kept the HTML clean and semantic, making it easy to understand and maintain.
Does the solution differ considerably from the design?
The solution closely follows the design provided in the challenge. I paid attention to details such as colors, typography, and spacing to match the design as closely as possible. Any deviations were minor and made to improve responsiveness or accessibility.
0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord