Latest comments

• 

  P

  Svitlana•50

  @svetlanakachanSubmitted 3 days ago

  What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

  Any feedback is welcome!

  

  Social links profile

  1

  20
  

  P

  AlejandroCavita•30

  @AlejandroCavitaPosted 3 days ago

  1. Does the solution include semantic HTML?

     • Yes, the solution includes semantic HTML elements such as <nav>, <article>, and <ul>. These elements help in defining the structure and meaning of the content, making it more accessible and SEO-friendly.

  2. Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made?

     • The solution uses class="sr-only" for screen readers, which is a good accessibility practice. However, improvements could include adding aria-labels to the links for better screen reader support and ensuring all interactive elements are keyboard navigable.

  3. Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes?

     • The layout is designed to be responsive, with media queries adjusting the card's dimensions for larger screens. This ensures the design looks good across various devices, from mobile to desktop.

  4. Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable?

     • The code is well-structured and uses CSS variables for colors and spacing, which enhances readability and reusability. The use of Flexbox and CSS Grid for layout management is also a good practice for creating flexible designs.

  0
• 

  laurice-m•40

  @laurice-mSubmitted 9 days ago

  

  CSS Flexbox, CSS Variables

  1

  10
  

  P

  AlejandroCavita•30

  @AlejandroCavitaPosted 9 days ago

  Does the solution include semantic HTML?

  Yes, the solution includes semantic HTML. I used appropriate HTML5 tags such as <article>, <header>, <footer>, and <section> to structure the content meaningfully. This improves the accessibility and SEO of the webpage.

  Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made?

  The solution is partially accessible. I ensured that the text has sufficient contrast and used semantic HTML to improve accessibility. However, there are areas for improvement:

  • Adding ARIA labels to interactive elements for better screen reader support.
  • Ensuring all interactive elements are keyboard navigable.
  • Providing alternative text for images to describe their content.

  Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes?

  Yes, the layout looks good on a range of screen sizes. I adopted a mobile-first approach and used media queries to adjust the design for larger screens. The card layout adapts seamlessly from mobile devices to desktop screens, ensuring a consistent user experience.

  Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable?

  The code is well-structured, readable, and reusable. I used CSS custom properties to maintain consistency in styles and organized the CSS rules logically. The use of Flexbox and media queries is clear and easy to follow. Additionally, I kept the HTML clean and semantic, making it easy to understand and maintain.

  Does the solution differ considerably from the design?

  The solution closely follows the design provided in the challenge. I paid attention to details such as colors, typography, and spacing to match the design as closely as possible. Any deviations were minor and made to improve responsiveness or accessibility.

  0
• 

  P

  Remco Horbach•100

  @RemcoHorbachSubmitted 14 days ago

  

  QR code component

  2

  10
  

  P

  AlejandroCavita•30

  @AlejandroCavitaPosted 14 days ago

  Code Review

  1. Does the solution include semantic HTML?

  Yes, but there is room for improvement.

  • The code uses semantic elements like <section>, which is a good practice.
  • Potential improvement:
    • Using <main> instead of <div class="container"> would improve semantics since the QR code component is the main content of the page.
    • The <h1> is correctly used for the main heading, but if this is part of a larger site, ensure that there are no multiple <h1> elements on the page.

  ---

  2. Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made?

  Fairly accessible, but some improvements could be made.

  Good points:

  • Correct use of semantic tags.
  • The alt attribute is present for the image (alt="Qr"), which helps screen readers.

  Recommended improvements:

  • The alt text should be more descriptive, such as "QR code linking to Frontend Mentor", to provide better context.
  • Adding aria-labels or role="img" to improve accessibility further.
  • Ensure sufficient contrast between text and background colors for readability.

  ---

  3. Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes?

  Yes, but some adjustments could enhance responsiveness.

  • The use of flexbox ensures that the QR code container is centered and adapts to different screen sizes.

  Potential improvements:

  • The .qr-code width is fixed at 300px. Instead, using max-width: 90% with a min-width could make it more fluid on smaller screens.
  • The h1 and p text could have better spacing adjustments on very small screens to prevent crowding.

  ---

  4. Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable?

  Yes, it is structured well, but some refinements could be made.

  • The use of CSS variables (--color-background, etc.) improves maintainability and reusability.

  Suggestions for better readability and reusability:

  • Remove the extra space in <link rel=" stylesheet" href="./styles.css" type="text/css" />, as it might cause loading issues.
  • Keeping the paragraph text (<p>) in a single element rather than splitting it into two would enhance readability and avoid unnecessary markup.

  ---

  5. Does the solution differ considerably from the design?

  No, it stays close to the expected design.

  • The QR code component maintains the expected structure and alignment.
  • The styling closely matches the typical Frontend Mentor design expectations.

  ---

  Final Verdict

  Strong solution overall with a clean structure and good responsiveness.
  Minor improvements in accessibility, responsiveness, and markup structure could make it even better. 🚀

  0