Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found

All comments

  • @luisgustavogorniak

    Posted

    Nicely done man, looks very similar to the design. Your code is very well written, and the styles look really great! I can see you put a lot of effort in it! Congrats and keep coding!

    0
  • @Joshdefleur

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    Im proud of the fact I made it responsive, but next time I would like to learn what are the industry standard breakpoints. Also if it was better to use flexbox or css grid. Im not sure when you should use either one

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    It was a challenge to get the breakpoints to seemlessly transition. Also it was hard to get my title of the page to line up with 2 lines of equal length, im not sure i did it right because it looks stretched in some cases. But i did research and tried my hardest.

    What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

    Trying to get my title lines to be the same length without stretching so much?

    @luisgustavogorniak

    Posted

    Nicely done! Looks really close to the design! I can see you put a lot of effort in it!

    To answer your first question, flexbox and grid are CSS rules that basically do the same thing, but the best practices are to use grid when its for building a complex layout and flexbox is just for align elements.

    If you're interested in build a table-like layout, grid is a go, but if you're trying to align elements inside the cells of the grid created table, flexbox is the best choice.

    About the responsiveness of the page:

    • I see you worried about the UX by adding a lot of media queries for differents viewports of differents type of devices. In this kind of job its better that you keep it simple, a single media query call just for when the viewport is for a mobile device is enough.
    • That said, my advice is to adhere to the concept of mobile first. Today is importanter that you first build your code to work on mobile devices first, and then you add the media query for its no longer a screen of a mobile device, like: @media screen and (min-width: 784px).

    You'll see that its much less work and your code will look cleaner.

    Lastly, about your titles, they look streched because they're using the same h1 element, and its parent element is setted to have a static width. Try removing the width rule and separating the titles with h1 tag for each, and change the parent div rules for flexbox and text-align, like this:

    .bigText {
      display: flex;
      flex-direction: column;
      text-align: center;
    }
    

    I hope my review is helpful, my friend! Have a good one and keep coding!

    0
  • @luisgustavogorniak

    Posted

    Well done! It looks very close to the design!

    There are two points that I consider relevant:

    Just be careful when setting the width of the elements, depending on the user's viewport, the card will look messy. Instead, try changing it to min-width, so when the viewport changes, it will look as expected.

    When working with responsive pages, I recommend that you use the mobile concept first and then adapt it to a larger viewport. You will see that it is much easier to code than the other way around and, after all, people use their mobile devices much more than desktop computers, so to speak.

    Other than that your project looks really great! I hope my review is useful! Have a good one and keep coding!

    Marked as helpful

    0
  • @luisgustavogorniak

    Posted

    Looks really great man, nicely done!

    The desktop version needs a little fixing because of the extra div at the end of the HTML file, but its nothing, If you remove it probably the white line at the bottom of the page will desapear.

    The mobile version needs some padding and some alignment in the main tag, but that's about it!

    I hope my review was helpful! Have a good one and keep coding!

    Marked as helpful

    0
  • @luisgustavogorniak

    Posted

    Your code is very well written! You really explored a lot of HTML semantics. Good use of the section and main tags.

    There are some issues with the styling, specifically sizing. The card is kind of breaking when you go into developer mode to adjust the viewer's screen size.

    Be careful when setting the width and height of an element. These rules will end up messing up the element if the viewport is different from the one you were developing the code in.

    Try using margin and padding instead, the element will be static unless you set a rule for media query, which by the way it would be nice if you added it to differentiate mobile and desktop viewports.

    Other than that, congrats on the effort and keep coding!

    0
  • @luisgustavogorniak

    Posted

    Looks good, Nicely done!

    Here's some points that could help you improve the code:

    • It needs a little bit of work on the margin & padding of the elements of the card, the figma file contains all these information.
    • try using some semanthics HTML tags, like <article> and <section> and CSS rule names, like .card and .card-text;

    I hope my review is helpful! Have a good one and keep coding!

    Marked as helpful

    1
  • @luisgustavogorniak

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    It was a simple template, just created some CSS rules and it worked well.

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    Couldn't find the specs of the fonts, sent the repo anyway.

    @luisgustavogorniak

    Posted

    Thank you so much for your feedbak! I really appreciate it! Did some changes as you suggested, it looks a little closer now. It still needs more work on the margin and padding of the card elements I guess.

    0