Lackevil• 80
@Lackevil
Submitted
iamitshaw-007
@iamitshaw-007
All comments
- iamitshaw-007• 120
@iamitshaw-007
Posted
on screen width ranging 470px - 770px, your page styles are a little off, other than that it's really organized and maintainable in my opinion. Keep it up brother and Happy Coding!
Marked as helpful
1 - PDan Marius• 625
@danmlarsen
Submitted
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?
I really get an appreciation of how difficult it can be to get the correct spacing, colors etc without the design file.
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?
I always appreciate any form of feedback
iamitshaw-007• 120@iamitshaw-007
Posted
Brother, you have nailed it, It looks good and your code is organized and maintainable. Just one little improvement, For nutrition table, you could have used table element. Thanks and Regards Happy Coding 🥳
Marked as helpful
1 - Lackevil• 80
@Lackevil
Submitted
iamitshaw-007• 120@iamitshaw-007
Posted
You have nailed it brother, It's looking good as well as it's really organized and maintainable.
Marked as helpful
1 - Ramírez Jordan• 190
@RamirezJordan
Submitted
iamitshaw-007• 120@iamitshaw-007
Posted
Looks Good and It's really organized.
0 - ICode88• 280
@ICode88
Submitted
What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?
Day 1 "I’m particularly proud of the responsive design we implemented, which ensures that the website looks and functions well across various devices, from desktops to mobile phones."
iamitshaw-007• 120@iamitshaw-007
Posted
Does the solution include semantic HTML?
- Try using more sematic tags
Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes?
- Yes, it looks good on divices
Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable?
- Yes, it was organized, and readable, but can use BEM naming convention for naming classes which will enhance readability
Does the solution differ considerably from the design?
- It matches quite perfectly
0
