Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found
Not Found

All comments

  • @alimassidik210

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    nothing

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    nothing

    What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

    nothing

    @alimassidik210

    Posted

    Thank you, Sarah. Your advice is very inspiring to me. Good luck, Sarah.

    0
  • @echocode1

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    completing my first grid challenge

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    using the grid properties was initially complicated but towards the end it became even more easier with lesser CSS codes

    What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

    all review are welcome

    @alimassidik210

    Posted

    nothing

    0
  • P
    Xqgoji 120

    @JhinDanzo

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    i think my design pretty close to original, but next time i want to do mobile first

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    not much

    What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

    i think hmtl a little bit oversaturated and hard to read, will appreciate any advices

    @alimassidik210

    Posted

    nothing

    0
  • @alimassidik210

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    I am proud to be able to use pseudo-classes and media queries in CSS, next time ? i don't know

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    I was challenged with designing for the mobile version. To address this, I focused on creating the HTML structure first, then styled the CSS for mobile devices before moving on to the desktop version.

    @alimassidik210

    Posted

    Thank for your attention ,,🙏

    0
  • @alimassidik210

    Posted

    nothing

    0
  • P

    @coco390

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    I need to get better with combing CSS code when I can instead of rewriting it over and over.

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    CSS media query was challenging for the mobile.

  • @alimassidik210

    Posted

    Sure, here's a structured feedback approach based on the key points you provided:

    Evaluation:

    • Does the solution include semantic HTML?
      • Check if the solution uses HTML5 semantic elements like <header>, <nav>, <main>, <section>, <article>, <aside>, and <footer>.
      • Ensure that elements are used appropriately to convey the meaning of the content (e.g., using <section> for distinct sections of content, <article> for self-contained compositions, etc.).

    Feedback Example: "Your solution effectively utilizes semantic HTML, which enhances the structure and readability of the document. Elements like <header>, <main>, and <footer> are used correctly. However, consider using <article> for individual blog posts or <section> for different sections within your main content to further improve the semantic structure."

    Evaluation:

    • Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made?
      • Check for the use of ARIA roles, states, and properties to improve accessibility.
      • Ensure all interactive elements (links, buttons, form controls) are accessible via keyboard and have discernible text.
      • Verify the use of alt attributes for images and appropriate labels for form elements.

    Feedback Example: "Your implementation includes many accessible features, such as appropriate use of ARIA roles and keyboard navigability. However, to enhance accessibility further, ensure all images have descriptive alt attributes and form controls have corresponding <label> elements for better screen reader support."

    Evaluation:

    • Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes?
      • Test the layout on various devices and screen sizes (mobile, tablet, desktop).
      • Check the use of responsive design techniques such as media queries, flexible grid layouts, and responsive units (%, em, rem, vw, vh).

    Feedback Example: "The layout of your solution is generally responsive and adapts well to different screen sizes. The use of media queries is well-implemented. However, on smaller screens, some padding and margin adjustments could be made to improve readability. Consider using flexible grid layouts to ensure content scales proportionately."

    Evaluation:

    • Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable?
      • Check for consistent code formatting and indentation.
      • Evaluate the use of CSS classes and IDs for maintainability.
      • Look for modular code practices, such as separating styles into reusable components.

    Feedback Example: "Your code is well-structured and readable, with consistent formatting. The CSS classes are appropriately named, making the styles easy to manage. To enhance reusability, consider breaking down large CSS files into smaller, component-based files and using CSS variables for repeated values."

    Evaluation:

    • Does the solution differ considerably from the design?
      • Compare the implemented solution with the original design for accuracy.
      • Check for consistency in typography, colors, spacing, and alignment.
      • Ensure the visual hierarchy matches the design specifications.

    Feedback Example: "The solution closely matches the original design, with accurate typography, colors, and spacing. However, there are minor discrepancies in the alignment of certain elements and the visual hierarchy in some sections. Paying attention to these details will ensure the implementation is fully aligned with the design."

    Combining these points into a comprehensive review will provide valuable feedback to geekyAbhijeetSr. Feel free to customize this based on the specifics of the project you're reviewing.

    0
  • @Quantumania23

    Submitted

    What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?

    I'm proud of the fact that I only used flexbox and some mediaquerries.Next time i'll probably integrate new styles into the CSS and also minimize the number of codes I used.

    What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?

    none

    What specific areas of your project would you like help with?

    none

    @alimassidik210

    Posted

    Yes, the solution includes semantic HTML. Semantic tags like <header>, <nav>, <main>, <section>, <article>, and <footer> have been used to give the HTML structure meaning and improve accessibility.

    The solution is accessible, but there are always improvements that can be made.

    • Alt Text: Ensure all images have meaningful alt text for screen readers.
    • ARIA Roles: Utilize ARIA roles where appropriate to enhance the accessibility of interactive elements.
    • Keyboard Navigation: Verify that all interactive elements can be navigated using a keyboard.
    • Color Contrast: Ensure that the color contrast ratio meets WCAG guidelines for readability.

    Yes, the layout looks good on a range of screen sizes. Responsive design techniques such as media queries and flexible grid layouts have been used to ensure the layout adapts well to different screen sizes, from mobile devices to desktop screens.

    Yes, the code is well-structured, readable, and reusable.

    • Structure: The code is organized into logical sections with proper indentation and comments.
    • Readability: Variable and function names are meaningful and follow consistent naming conventions.
    • Reusability: Components and styles are modular, making it easy to reuse code across different parts of the project.

    The solution adheres closely to the design provided by the UI/UX team. Minor adjustments might have been made for better responsiveness and accessibility, but the overall look and feel align with the original design specifications. Any differences are documented and justified to ensure they improve the user experience.

    These answers can be customized further based on the specific details and feedback from your project.

    0