@123nithya
Submitted
@BigO-Dev
@123nithya
Submitted
@BigO-Dev
Posted
Overall, you did an excellent job of coming close to the design. Some things to work on:
<main>
section where your main content is a good idea.@h-mihail
Submitted
What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?
.
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?
.
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?
.
@BigO-Dev
Posted
Semantic HTML Assessment:
<figure>
for the profile picture is appropriate and semantically correct.div
elements used for buttons should be replaced with semantically correct elements, as div
does not convey any meaning about its content.Suggestions for Improvement:
div
elements with button
or a
(anchor) elements for the links. This is crucial for accessibility because div
elements are not focusable or keyboard accessible by default. For instance:
<button class="button">GitHub</button>
<!-- or -->
<a href="https://github.com" class="button">GitHub</a>
<header>
within the .card
for the name and location if it suits the card's context, improving the document structure.Accessibility Assessment:
alt
text, which is good for accessibility.role="main"
is redundant on the <main>
element, as <main>
inherently carries that role.Suggestions for Improvement:
div
) are accessible. Use <button>
or <a>
with proper aria-label
attributes if the text content is not descriptive enough.:focus
styles along with :hover
to improve keyboard navigation visibility.Responsive Design Assessment:
Suggestions for Improvement:
Code Quality Assessment:
Suggestions for Improvement:
:root {
--primary-bg-color: hsl(0, 0%, 12%);
--button-hover-bg-color: hsl(75, 94%, 57%);
}
.button {
background-color: var(--primary-bg-color);
&:hover {
background-color: var(--button-hover-bg-color);
}
}
The code effectively sets up a visually appealing social links profile card. Emphasizing semantic HTML and accessibility improvements will greatly enhance its functionality and user experience, particularly for those using assistive technologies. Adding responsive design elements will ensure the card looks good on all devices.
@Dav1dGP
Submitted
What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?
What I am most proud of is the time and ease of doing this project.
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?
As with the QR project, the biggest challenge has been to center the container and make it responsive.
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?
Tips related to responsive are welcome.
@BigO-Dev
Posted
Assessment:
<main>
and <footer>
, which are semantic elements that help define the structure of the web page. This is good practice.<p>
tag incorrectly closed with </h2>
. It should be properly closed with </p>
.Suggestions for Improvement:
<p class="tag">Learning</h2>
.<article>
for the card container to provide more semantic meaning to the content block which seems to represent an article.Assessment:
Suggestions for Improvement:
<div>
with class "author" should use a proper <figure>
and <figcaption>
element for the avatar and its caption.Assessment:
Suggestions for Improvement:
transform: scale(0.9)
as this could lead to unpredictable layout results. Instead, use responsive units like percentages or viewport units for better control.em
/rem
rather than fixed pixels where possible.Assessment:
Suggestions for Improvement:
.author
, flex-direction: center;
is invalid. If you meant to center items, use justify-content: center;
and align-items: center;
within a flex container.position: absolute;
for the footer unless absolutely necessary. This can lead to content overlapping or being cut off on smaller screens. Consider alternatives like position: relative;
or flex layouts.Your code is on the right track with a good use of CSS custom properties and semantic HTML elements. Focus on fixing the noted errors, improving accessibility features, and refining the responsive behavior of your layout to enhance usability and maintainability. This will lead to a more robust and user-friendly web page.
Marked as helpful
@AdityaNair07
Submitted
@BigO-Dev
Posted
Assessment: The provided HTML code is quite simple and does not make extensive use of semantic HTML elements. It primarily uses <div>
elements for layout, which are non-semantic. While this is sufficient for a simple project like this, using more semantic elements could improve accessibility and the overall structure of the document.
Suggestions for Improvement:
<div>
tags with semantic HTML5 elements where appropriate. For example, wrapping the main content in <main>
, using <section>
for the card, and <footer>
for the attribution.<header>
for any headings or introductory content if added later.Assessment: The code includes some aspects of accessibility such as the alt
attribute on the <img>
tag, which is good. However, there are areas for improvement.
Suggestions for Improvement:
aria-labels
where necessary to provide more descriptive labels for assistive technologies.overflow: hidden
on the body, as it can cut off content and restrict the page’s navigability with a screen reader or when zoomed in.Assessment: The layout employs a basic responsive design using flexbox which centers the card and makes the website look good on various screen sizes. However, the fixed width of the card (250px
) may be too small for larger screens or too large for very small devices.
Suggestions for Improvement:
em
for widths, and consider using media queries to handle different screen sizes more gracefully.Assessment: The code is generally well-structured and readable. Inline CSS in the <head>
section is well organized, and classes are meaningfully named which is good for maintainability.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Overall, the code provides a basic, visually appealing QR code component with a decent start on accessibility. The improvements suggested would help make the page more semantic, accessible, and responsive, improving the overall user experience and maintainability of the code.
Marked as helpful
@WilliamAndradeMoura
Submitted
@BigO-Dev
Posted
Overall, your project is well-constructed, with a clear structure and good style decisions. Addressing the minor issues below will enhance its accessibility and maintainability.
<title>
tag ("component" should be "component").<img>
tag is missing an alt attribute. This attribute is crucial for accessibility as it provides a text alternative for screen readers.<head>
section of your HTML to ensure it loads before your page content. This helps avoid a flash of unstyled content (FOUC)..text
, you've used text p
which is incorrect. It should be .text p
to correctly select the paragraph within the .text
class.Marked as helpful