Ashutosh-Neupane
@Ashutosh-NeupaneAll comments
- @alzwo1Submitted 4 months ago@Ashutosh-NeupanePosted 4 months ago
The solution effectively demonstrates a clean and straightforward layout with Flexbox, but could benefit from using CSS Grid for more control over the positioning and alignment of elements. This would improve responsiveness and make layout adjustments easier across different screen sizes.
0 - @wolf2lyonSubmitted 4 months ago@Ashutosh-NeupanePosted 4 months ago
Your solution demonstrates a solid understanding of responsive design principles and effective use of CSS to style a product preview card. The mobile-first approach is well-implemented, and you’ve successfully incorporated media queries to adjust the layout for larger screens.
Marked as helpful0 - @syeero7Submitted 4 months agoWhat are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?
Next time I will use
flex-shrink
instead of media queries to reduce padding size@Ashutosh-NeupanePosted 4 months agoHere’s some feedback on the solution:
Strengths:
Responsive Design: The use of media queries effectively adjusts the layout and styling for various screen sizes, ensuring a consistent user experience across devices. The approach of starting with a mobile-first design is particularly commendable.
Visual Appeal: The design choices, including the use of color and hover effects, contribute to a visually engaging and interactive user experience. The profile card has a polished look with rounded corners and shadow effects.
Font and Typography: Implementing custom fonts and careful attention to text styling enhances the overall aesthetic and readability of the content.
Accessibility: The solution demonstrates an awareness of accessibility by incorporating some basic styles, though there is room for further improvement in this area.
Areas for Improvement:
Enhanced Responsiveness: While the design adapts well to various screen sizes, further testing and adjustments may be needed to ensure perfect scaling on very small devices and specific orientations.
Accessibility Considerations: Adding more accessibility features, such as better color contrast ratios, ARIA labels, and ensuring all interactive elements are accessible via keyboard, would make the site more inclusive.
Performance Optimization: Review and optimize resource loading, such as font files and images, to improve page load times. Consider lazy loading for images and efficient font handling.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: Verify that the design functions consistently across different browsers and their versions. Address any inconsistencies or issues found during testing.
CSS Efficiency: Consider using CSS Grid for more complex layouts, which can simplify and streamline the CSS. Also, leveraging CSS variables could enhance maintainability and consistency in styling.
1 - @DINES-01Submitted 4 months ago@Ashutosh-NeupanePosted 4 months ago
Overall Design and Layout: Visual appeal, structure, and alignment. Functionality: How well the interactive elements and features work. Performance: Loading times and efficiency. Accessibility: Inclusivity and usability for all users. Code Quality: Readability, maintainability, and best practices. Responsiveness: How well the design adapts to different screen sizes and devices.
0 - @sahilraj-developerSubmitted 4 months agoWhat are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?
i make the site responsive , getting problem in responsive design
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?i change in making the page responsive , overcome by learning the flex and media query
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?html,css,js ,react.h
@Ashutosh-NeupanePosted 4 months agosolution is solid and demonstrates a good understanding of layout and styling. Implementing the suggestions above can help refine the project further and address any potential issues.
0