@a-yemisi
Posted
Does the solution include semantic HTML? I do not necessarily see semantic HTML, but the solution is not complicated, so it's fine if there is no semantic HTML. . . Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made? The solution is accessible, the solution is close enough to the design but could be better. . . Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes? The layout looks good on a range of screen sizes. . . Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable? I am not sure about the structure of your code, your html is readable, but your CSS is a lot. It will be easier to study if it was simpler, I did not understand the need for 3 CSS files. . . Does the solution differ considerably from the design? The solution differed from the design, but generally it was fine.
In conclusion, your design is fine, my major concern was the structure of your CSS code, and that it differs a bit from the original design. Good job!
