@Rohloffmeister
Posted
Positive Aspects:
-
The HTML structure is well-organized and semantically correct, using appropriate tags like
<article>
,<section>
, and others. -
The CSS utilizes modern techniques such as Flexbox for layout and custom properties for colors
-
The JavaScript code is concise and effective in implementing the share button functionality:
shareIcon.addEventListener('click', () => {
shareOptions.classList.toggle('visible');
shareIcon.classList.toggle('active');
});
Areas for Improvement:
-
The CSS could be moved to a separate file to enhance readability and reusability.
-
Some CSS selectors could be more specific to avoid unintended style overlaps.
Responsiveness Issues:
- The code uses many fixed pixel values for widths and heights, limiting flexibility on different screen sizes:
.card {
width: auto;
height: 300px;
}
- There's only one media query for the image, but none for the card layout itself:
<source media="(max-width:650px)" srcset="./images/drawers.jpg" />
- Potential overflow problems on smaller screens due to fixed card dimensions.
- The absolute positioning of the share option could be problematic on smaller screens:
.share-option {
position: absolute;
margin-top: -125px;
margin-left: -106px;
}
To improve responsiveness, consider:
- Using relative units (%, em, rem) instead of fixed pixel values
- Adding more media queries for different breakpoints
- Implementing a more flexible layout that adapts better to various screen sizes
- Revising the share option positioning for mobile devices
- Using
max-width
andmin-width
instead of fixed widths
It would be advisable to test the design on various devices and make appropriate adjustments to ensure better responsiveness.
Keep it up. Best Regards, Ulrich Rohloff
Marked as helpful