Design comparison
SolutionDesign
Solution retrospective
What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?
I have used the JS in this project even it wasn't required, because I didn't like the fact you have to repeat the code multiple times while you can use basic JS and get similar results, the css was challenging because of that but I worked around it. and it turned out right, of course it could be better.
any feedbacks are welcome :)
Community feedback
- @DarkstarXDDPosted 5 months ago
- There is no
<header>
in this design.<header>
is for content that repeats across multiple pages in a website, like the brand logo and the navigation bar. - Everything in this design can be included in the
<main>
, not just the bottom part. - The site currently looks broken in mid size screens. Content are overflowing. You should avoid using fixed widths and heights for containers, there is no need to use
min-width
either. - Didn't you start mobile first when developing the page? If not try going through this article. It will give you a good idea.
- The name and the verified status are not list items. They are just separate
<p>
elements. I think i gave you this feedback on a previous challenge too. You have to be careful what you use lists for.
Marked as helpful1 - There is no
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord