Design comparison
Community feedback
- @MouadaselPosted 3 months ago
-
Semantic HTML: The site uses semantic HTML elements like <header>, <nav>, <main>, and <footer> effectively.
-
Accessibility: Positives: Includes alt attributes for images and good text contrast. Improvements: Ensure all interactive elements have discernible text, use ARIA roles, and verify smooth keyboard navigation.
-
Responsiveness: The layout adapts well across different screen sizes. Enhancements: Test on more devices and adjust text sizes for smaller screens.
-
Code Quality: Well-structured with clear class names and modular CSS. Suggestions: Use CSS preprocessors, apply BEM methodology, and refactor repetitive code.
-
Design Consistency: Aligns well with the design specifications.
Overall, the project demonstrates strong technical and design skills with room for minor improvements in accessibility and code maintainability.
Marked as helpful1@Supa-Thobile2Posted 3 months ago@Mouadasel Thank you for your feedback!
I will take into consideration all your suggestions and research on some of the concepts. The BEM is one of them, I have heard of the concept but never really went in deep but I think I get the lesson you are trying to teach me. Thanks again for showing me the way!
0 -
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord