
Design comparison
Community feedback
- P@jeffgrahamcodesPosted 2 months ago
Your solution demonstrates a solid foundation, with a clear effort to align the design closely with the original mockup. The layout is responsive and adapts well to different screen sizes, maintaining its structure and readability. The use of semantic HTML elements like <article> and <section> helps provide meaning to the content. However, to further enhance accessibility, adding descriptive alt text to images (e.g., “Portrait of Jessica Randall”) and ensuring buttons have clear aria-labels or descriptive text to explain their purpose would be valuable improvements. Additionally, implementing visible :focus styles for buttons can enhance usability for keyboard navigation.
The CSS is organized and makes effective use of modern techniques like flexbox for alignment and responsiveness. However, consolidating repeated styles, such as those for buttons, into reusable classes would improve maintainability and reduce redundancy. Testing on ultra-small viewports (under 320px) could help refine spacing and padding for tighter layouts. The solution is very close to the original design, but slight adjustments to typography sizes and spacing could bring it even closer to pixel-perfect accuracy. Overall, this is a well-executed project with minor adjustments needed for accessibility and code optimization. Great job!
Marked as helpful0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord