Design comparison
SolutionDesign
Solution retrospective
This is the result that i campe up with , dont hesitate to comment or if you have any suggestion
Community feedback
- @0xabdulkhaliqPosted over 1 year ago
Hello there π. Congratulations on successfully completing the challenge! π
- I have other recommendations regarding your code that I believe will be of great interest to you.
HTML π·οΈ:
- This solution lacks proper usage of semantic markup, which causes lacking of landmark for a webpage and allows accessibility issues to screen readers, due to accessibility errors our website may not reach its intended audience, face legal consequences, and have poor search engine rankings, highlighting the importance of ensuring accessibility and avoiding errors.
- What is meant by landmark ?, They used to define major sections of your page instead of relying on generic elements like
<div>
or<span>
. They are use to provide a more precise detail of the structure of our webpage to the browser or screen readers
- For example:
- The
<main>
element should include all content directly related to the page's main idea, so there should only be one per page - The
<footer>
typically contains information about the author of the section, copyright data or links to related documents.
- The
- So fix it by replacing the wrapping
<section>
element with the semantic element<main>
in yourindex.html
file to improve accessibility and organization of your page.
.
I hope you find this helpful π Above all, the solution you submitted is great !
Happy coding!
Marked as helpful0@mohammedbahniniPosted over 1 year ago@0xAbdulKhalid Thanks a lot for your effort , in the next challenges i am gonna try to aply your advices for better solution .
0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord