Design comparison
Solution retrospective
I'm proud of how good it ended up looking. I don't think I'd do anything differently.
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?The biggest problem I encountered was the section container not being in the middle vertically. It turns out that you have to set a height for the body for there to be more space than the elements you place make.
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?I think I'm mostly curious if it could be written better, especially CSS.
Community feedback
- @StroudyPosted 2 months ago
Amazing job with this! You’re making fantastic progress. Here are some small tweaks that might take your solution to the next level…
-
Using a full modern CSS reset is beneficial because it removes default browser styling, creating a consistent starting point for your design across all browsers. It helps avoid unexpected layout issues and makes your styles more predictable, ensuring a uniform appearance on different devices and platforms, check out this site for a Full modern reset
-
For future project, You could download and host your own fonts using
@font-face
improves website performance by reducing external requests, provides more control over font usage, ensures consistency across browsers, enhances offline availability, and avoids potential issues if third-party font services become unavailable. Place to get .woff2 fonts -
While
px
is useful for precise, fixed sizing, such asborder-width
,border-radius
,inline-padding
, and<img>
sizes, it has limitations. Pixels don't scale well with user settings or adapt to different devices, which can negatively impact accessibility and responsiveness. For example, usingpx
for font sizes can make text harder to read on some screens, Check this article why font-size must NEVER be in pixels. In contrast, relative units likerem
andem
adjust based on the user’s preferences and device settings, making your design more flexible and accessible. Usepx
where exact sizing is needed, but prefer relative units for scalable layouts. If you want a deeper explanation watch this video by Kevin Powell CSS em and rem explained. Another great resource I found useful is this px to rem converter based on the default font-size of 16 pixel. -
Using
max-width: 100%
ormin-width: 100%
is more responsive than justwidth: 100%
because they allow elements to adjust better to different screen sizes. To learn more, check out this article: responsive-meaning.
You’re doing fantastic! I hope these tips help you as you continue your coding journey. Stay curious and keep experimenting—every challenge is an opportunity to learn. Have fun, and keep coding with confidence! 🌟
Marked as helpful1@JxPV5Posted 2 months ago@Stroudy Thank you so much! Your feedback is very useful, I greatly appreciate it. Next time I will no doubt do better in terms of responsivity and thanks for the kind words as well!
1 -
- @MikDra1Posted 2 months ago
If you want to make your card responsive with ease you can use this technique:
.card { width: 90%; max-width: 37.5rem; }
On the smaller screens card will be 90% of the parent (here body), but as soon as the card will be 37.5rem (600px) it will lock with this size.
Also to put the card in the center I advise you to use this code snippet:
.container { display: grid; place-items: center; }
Hope you found this comment helpful 💗💗💗
Good job and keep going 😁😊😉
Marked as helpful1@JxPV5Posted 2 months ago@MikDra1 Huge thanks for the feedback! I really enjoy learning things I like and knowing that there are kind people like you willing to give some helpful advice is amazing and it motivates me even further.
0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord