Design comparison
Community feedback
- @vgt3j4d4Posted 2 months ago
-
Does the solution include semantic HTML? Not much (more on the next question answer)
-
Is it accessible, and what improvements could be made? I see it is using only
<div>
,<h1>
,<h2>
,<h3>
,<p>
,<span>
but some other tags could have been used to improve accessibility (help screen readers and people with visual impairements). Like<header>
,<ol>
(ordered list, so you don't need to manually add the list number in the Ingredients section. Probably<section>
and<em>
or<strong>
tags could have been used too. Check this one: Alternatives to using divs you might find it helpful. -
Does the layout look good on a range of screen sizes? Well, looks good on Desktop and Mobile. One thing I found was that even though
-
Is the code well-structured, readable, and reusable? Well I believe readability and reusability will improve if we use BEM naming convention and a pre processor like Sass. These 2 things are not really complicated and I believe it would really help you if you start using it in the next projects.
-
Does the solution differ considerably from the design? Not much.
0 -
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord