QR Code Component Solution using SCSS and Responsive Design
Design comparison
Solution retrospective
I’m proud of how I managed to create a responsive design with a clean layout using SCSS. The project gave me the opportunity to refine my understanding of CSS custom properties and hover effects. Next time, I would like to focus more on accessibility features, such as better focus styles and ARIA attributes for better user interaction and using Grid for more complex layouts.
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?One of the challenges was setting up GitHub Pages correctly with the <base> tag to ensure the live site displayed all resources correctly. I overcame this by researching and learning about how the <base> tag works and applying it in the project. Another challenge was handling hover effects without distorting text, which I resolved by isolating transformations using CSS properties like transform: scale(1) on specific elements.
I would appreciate feedback on how I could further optimize my SCSS structure or improve accessibility for users. Any suggestions for making the layout more adaptive or enhancing the hover effects would also be helpful.
Community feedback
- @yuriinykPosted 2 months ago
*Yes, the solution uses semantic HTML. All elements are correctly marked up according to their purpose, which not only improves accessibility but also helps search engines understand the content context. For example, there is the use of <header>, <section>, <footer> tags, etc. *The solution seems to be fairly accessible; however, to improve accessibility, additional attributes like aria-label could be added to navigational elements or interactive buttons. Also, keyboard navigation support could be enhanced so that users with limited mobility can interact with the web page easily. *Yes, the layout is responsive and looks great on different screen sizes thanks to the use of media queries *Yes, the code is well-structured with proper indentation and clear separation between styles, scripts, and HTML. The class names are logical and meaningful, making it easy to understand the purpose of elements. The code is easily extendable or modifiable for future use or reuse. *he solution is generally in line with the project brief, but there are a few minor differences. For example, the layout or design may differ slightly from the original mockup, either in terms of spacing or the positioning of elements. Additionally, some features or styles might have been enhanced or adjusted for better functionality, but this does not compromise the overall goal of the project. These differences are usually small improvements or personal touches that can be justified as part of the developer’s creative process.
0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHub
Join our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord