Design comparison
Solution retrospective
I am happy that I used css variables to define colors
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?I had to adjust margins manually - not the smoothest approach.
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?How to make pixel-perfect solution? How to compare design with my solution side by side?
Community feedback
- @StroudyPosted about 2 months ago
Exceptional work! You’re showing great skill here. I’ve got a couple of minor suggestions that could make this stand out even more…
-
Using a
<main>
tag inside the<body>
of your HTML is a best practice because it clearly identifies the main content of your page. This helps with accessibility and improves how search engines understand your content. -
For future project, You could download and host your own fonts using
@font-face
improves website performance by reducing external requests, provides more control over font usage, ensures consistency across browsers, enhances offline availability, and avoids potential issues if third-party font services become unavailable. Place to get .woff2 fonts -
I think you can benefit from using a naming convention like BEM (Block, Element, Modifier) is beneficial because it makes your CSS more organized, readable, and easier to maintain. BEM helps you clearly understand the purpose of each class, avoid naming conflicts, and create reusable components, leading to a more scalable codebase. For more details BEM,
-
While
px
is useful for precise, fixed sizing, such asborder-width
,border-radius
,inline-padding
, and<img>
sizes, it has limitations. Pixels don't scale well with user settings or adapt to different devices, which can negatively impact accessibility and responsiveness. For example, usingpx
for font sizes can make text harder to read on some screens, Check this article why font-size must NEVER be in pixels. In contrast, relative units likerem
and adjust based on the user’s preferences and device settings, making your design more flexible and accessible. Usepx
where exact sizing is needed, but prefer relative units for scalable layouts. If you want a deeper explanation watch this video by Kevin Powell CSS em and rem explained. Another great resource I found useful is this px to rem converter based on the default font-size of 16 pixel. -
Using a full modern CSS reset is beneficial because it removes default browser styling, creating a consistent starting point for your design across all browsers. It helps avoid unexpected layout issues and makes your styles more predictable, ensuring a uniform appearance on different devices and platforms, check out this site for a Full modern reset
I hope you’re finding this guidance useful! Keep refining your skills and tackling new challenges with confidence. You’re making great progress—stay motivated and keep coding with enthusiasm! 💻
Marked as helpful1 -
- @Kiru100Posted about 2 months ago
- Good that is has semantic HTML element and also uses rem.
- It can still be improved though by updating its spacing, font sizes, card width and box shadow for the card.
- You can make it pixel perfect if you have the access to its design where you can see its exact measurement.
- Overall, it's a great solution and does looks like what's in the design. Good job!
Marked as helpful1 - @h13meyerPosted about 2 months ago
I am sorry that I can not help you with your specific questions since I am struggling at similar topics. But I like to suggest one little improvement on your solution: Setting the border radius of the image slightly smaler than the one of the card does lead to a better fit of the image into the card.
Marked as helpful1
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord