@alimassidik210
Posted
Yes, the solution includes semantic HTML. Semantic tags like <header>
, <nav>
, <main>
, <section>
, <article>
, and <footer>
have been used to give the HTML structure meaning and improve accessibility.
The solution is accessible, but there are always improvements that can be made.
- Alt Text: Ensure all images have meaningful
alt
text for screen readers. - ARIA Roles: Utilize ARIA roles where appropriate to enhance the accessibility of interactive elements.
- Keyboard Navigation: Verify that all interactive elements can be navigated using a keyboard.
- Color Contrast: Ensure that the color contrast ratio meets WCAG guidelines for readability.
Yes, the layout looks good on a range of screen sizes. Responsive design techniques such as media queries and flexible grid layouts have been used to ensure the layout adapts well to different screen sizes, from mobile devices to desktop screens.
Yes, the code is well-structured, readable, and reusable.
- Structure: The code is organized into logical sections with proper indentation and comments.
- Readability: Variable and function names are meaningful and follow consistent naming conventions.
- Reusability: Components and styles are modular, making it easy to reuse code across different parts of the project.
The solution adheres closely to the design provided by the UI/UX team. Minor adjustments might have been made for better responsiveness and accessibility, but the overall look and feel align with the original design specifications. Any differences are documented and justified to ensure they improve the user experience.
These answers can be customized further based on the specific details and feedback from your project.