Design comparison
Solution retrospective
This is my first challenge on the platform. I chose it because it didn't look like I needed to do too much to make it responsive, and wanted to start with something simple. Overall I really enjoyed it, it was a big challenge for me but I'm happy with the final results.
Looking for feedback on the following areas:
- Use of semantic HTML - I'm not confident I've chosen the correct elements for the design
- General CSS good practices - is my CSS well written? Am I missing things?
- Background position - I was quite stuck on this property and I'm not completely confident with this part of my solution. Is there a better approach?
Community feedback
- @YazdunPosted about 3 years ago
Hello Lucy and well done on the challenge, Here are my suggestions :
-
Use Prettier extension on your IDE to format your code.
-
use code below instead of specifying default value for html element separately
*, *::before, *::after { margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box; }
- Html elements are block level by default ( thats one of the reason for approaching mobile first ), so you don't need š
display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; flex-direction: column;
on your
main
tag, you get the column by default-
give
min-height:100vh
instead ofheight:100%
to your body. -
right now, background circles are not responsive and layout breaks quite easily on smaller screens, so here is what I did on this challenge for background circle to make sure of their responsiveness. firstly add š
.c1 { right: 50%; bottom: 43%; } .c2 { top: 50%; left: 50%; } .c1, .c2 { position: fixed; transition: 0.5s cubic-bezier(0.075, 0.82, 0.165, 0.6); z-index: -1; }
to your css and then add images to the markup š
<img src="./assets/images/bg-pattern-top.svg" alt="" role="presentation" class="c1" /> <img src="./assets/images/bg-pattern-bottom.svg" role="presentation" alt="" class="c2" />
and then remove background properties from
body
. this way, background circles won't go bananas on smaller screens. keep in mind that's my approach and there are definitely better approaches you may come up with.-
use
width:100%
and thenmax-width: ... px
instead of giving a static width to your card, so card's layout won't break on small devices, right now your card leaves side scroll on small screens. -
I don't recommend using static heights for elements unless it's really crucial.
-
for stats, I think you'll be better off with something like
<ul class="card-stats"> <li><span>80k</span> <span>Followers</span></li> <li><span>803k</span> <span>Likes</span></li> <li><span>1.4k</span> <span>Photos</span></li> </ul>
instead of using so many divs.
- give some paddings to
body
so content won't occupy whole screen on mobile devices.
ā Also I opened a pull request to your repository which will fix these issues
I hope this was helpful
Marked as helpful2@lmac-1Posted almost 3 years ago@Yazdun Hi Yazdun, thank you so much for this feedback, it was SO useful and I learnt a lot! I'm so sorry but I've only had time to finish going through it all properly today.
I haven't accepted your pull request because I wanted to combine your advice with Mike's. I just made some changes this week on GitHub and hopefully, you can see an improvement :) open to any further feedback!
Thanks again!
https://github.com/lmac-1/profile-card-component
0 -
- @mhchenPosted about 3 years ago
Looks really solid!
HTML
Everything looks pretty good here, have two suggestions:
- Make the person's name an
<h1>
. It's the most important element on the page - Rarely used but the labels/stats could be dl/dt/dd ā would be
<dl>
for the enclosing element,<dt>
for the label (followers, likes photos),<dd>
for the numbers
CSS
Well organized overall!
One improvement I'd recommend: there are a few magic numbers in here. Namely, the
87px
for.card-stats
and the53px
in.card-header img
. The latter one is easier to address.Basically the
53px
only works because the image is a certain size (106px). If we were ever to swap out a different sized image here, the CSS would break.If you replace the
left
andbottom
properties with:bottom: 0; left: 50%; transform: translate(-50%, 50%);
You'll get the same centered effect with no magic numbers. I realize you might not have gotten to practice much with
translate
but this is a really powerful technique for centering.The other issue is harder to solve: it's because
.card-content
doesn't stretch to fill the whole length of the card, and it probably should. The best way to solve this is with a flexbox column approach on the parent element. Happy to go into this more if you're interested!Background position
Hard to imagine a better solution than the one you came up with! Glad you learned about multiple bg images
Marked as helpful0 - Make the person's name an
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord