
Design comparison
Solution retrospective
I’m most proud of the solution’s clean and well-organized structure, which closely matches the design provided. The use of semantic HTML elements such as <article>, <picture>, and <main> enhances the accessibility and readability of the markup. The layout is responsive and adapts effectively across mobile and desktop screen sizes, maintaining a polished and consistent appearance. CSS design tokens, such as variables for colors and typography, improve maintainability and scalability, which is a strong aspect of the implementation.
Next time, I would focus on improving accessibility by adding meaningful alt text to the product image to provide context for screen readers. Additionally, the button’s interactivity could be enhanced with focus and hover states to make it more dynamic and engaging for users. Refining the layout for tablet breakpoints, which are not explicitly addressed, would further strengthen the solution’s responsiveness and inclusivity.
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?ne challenge was achieving the correct spacing and alignment for the text content while keeping it visually balanced within the card. This was resolved by using CSS flexbox with properties like justify-content: space-around, ensuring even distribution of elements. Another challenge was maintaining consistency between mobile and desktop layouts, particularly for the image scaling and content alignment. This was successfully handled by using the <picture> element with media queries to provide the appropriate image size and aspect ratio for different devices. The overall approach demonstrates a solid grasp of responsive design principles and attention to detail.
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?I’d appreciate feedback on a few specific areas of the project. First, I’d like help refining accessibility, particularly ensuring that the product image and button have sufficient support for screen readers and keyboard navigation. Suggestions for improving interactivity, such as more engaging hover and focus states, would also be valuable.
Additionally, I’d welcome advice on how to optimize the CSS structure further, especially for the responsive design. While the desktop and mobile layouts work well, I’d like input on how to handle intermediate tablet breakpoints more effectively. Lastly, if there are opportunities to simplify or enhance the use of CSS variables to make the design system even more modular and reusable, I’d love to explore those improvements.
Community feedback
- @yamadaMk12Posted 2 months ago
This is a clean and well-structured HTML/CSS code for a product preview card component, with responsive design that adapts between desktop and mobile views. Here’s a review based on different aspects:
1. HTML Structure:
- The HTML is simple, semantic, and organized.
- Meta Tags: The meta tags for charset and viewport ensure proper rendering on all devices, which is great for accessibility.
- Fonts: The external links for Google Fonts are implemented properly, offering two fonts (Montserrat for body text and Fraunces for headings) which should provide a modern and clean look.
- Image Handling: The use of the
<picture>
element with twosrcset
attributes (for desktop and mobile images) ensures that the appropriate image is loaded based on the screen size, improving performance and responsiveness.
2. CSS Styling:
- Design Consistency: The CSS uses variables (e.g.,
--pure-white
,--cream
,--deep-aquamarine
) which ensure color consistency throughout the design. - Responsive Layout: The
@media screen
queries are correctly set up, which makes the card responsive. The card adjusts from a vertical layout on mobile to a horizontal layout on larger screens (desktop), ensuring that it’s visually pleasing on both devices. - Typography: The use of
Montserrat
andFraunces
helps to differentiate the content (e.g., category vs. title) effectively. The heading sizes and line spacing are well thought out. - Accessibility: The use of semantic HTML elements like
<h1>
,<p>
, and<button>
improves accessibility. Also, the image alt text is present, but could be improved for better accessibility, for example by describing the product in thealt
attribute. - Button Styling: The 'Add to Cart' button uses a distinct color (
--deep-aquamarine
), making it stand out and is easy to locate on the page. There's also a hover effect for the button, though it’s only described under the@media screen
for desktops. It would be ideal to define hover states for mobile as well, even if it’s a subtle change.
3. Performance:
- Image Optimization: The use of the
<picture>
element to serve different images based on screen size is good for performance. However, there could be further improvements such as using WebP format images for better quality-to-size ratios on the web. - Favicon: The favicon is set up correctly, though it’s always a good idea to ensure it’s used for multiple device sizes and display requirements.
4. Possible Improvements:
- HTML Semantics: While the code is quite semantic, there could be additional improvement by adding an
aria-label
for the button for screen readers or even adding roles where necessary. - Accessibility in Button: While you do provide an
alt
text for the cart image icon inside the button, a more descriptive text likeAdd product to cart
would be better for screen readers. - Unused CSS Properties: In the CSS, properties like
text-wrap
for paragraphs and headers are not widely supported or necessary. Removing them could simplify the code without any loss in functionality. - Mobile Interactions: The mobile experience could benefit from more interactive elements (e.g., smooth hover or active button effects) to enhance user engagement on touchscreens.
5. Overall Aesthetics:
- The design is elegant, minimalist, and well-suited for showcasing a product. The typography, colors, and layout contribute to a high-end, professional feel that fits well with showcasing luxury products.
- Color Contrast: The color contrast between text and background is clear and easy to read. However, in certain instances (like the original price), the contrast could be improved to ensure readability for people with visual impairments.
6. Minor Notes:
- In the mobile version, the image aspect ratio could be fixed, as there’s no clear indication of how the mobile images look when rendered.
Conclusion:
This HTML and CSS code represents a polished and well-thought-out design for a product preview card. It works well across devices, implements responsive design, and adheres to modern web development best practices. It can be further improved with small refinements for accessibility and some CSS optimizations, but overall, it’s a solid implementation for a product card component.
Marked as helpful1
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord