Design comparison
Community feedback
- @KristinaHorbenkoPosted 19 days ago
Overall, the code looks neat and understandable, but there are a few areas that could be improved, especially for the mobile version. Lack of Padding: In the mobile version, the text card lacks padding, which causes the text to be too close to the edges, reducing readability. Responsiveness: The card does not adapt well to smaller screens. This could be due to fixed sizes or a lack of media queries to adjust dimensions and padding for the mobile version. Using relative units (like em or %) instead of fixed values (px) could improve flexibility. Media Queries and @media Rules: To enhance the code's responsiveness on mobile devices, it would be beneficial to add more @media rules, which can adjust sizes, padding, and possibly show/hide certain elements for different screen sizes.
Marked as helpful0 - @loiccapePosted 19 days ago
Care about your file on assets , assets is here to contain extern source , like image font sound ... not code. But you did realy great job keep going mate
Marked as helpful0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord