Design comparison
Solution retrospective
I need some help with the placeholder and some feedback . Thanks!
Community feedback
- @pikapikamartPosted over 3 years ago
Hey, great work on this one. Though I had to zoom out more since I cannot see the top part of the layout which is not scrollable, the mobile state on the other hand is great.
Suggestion/s would be that:
-
Please refrain from using
height: 100vh
, this will only limit your layout based on the remaining viewport height or the height of your screen , this is why I had to zoom out because of that limit. Instead of that,min-height: 100vh
will be much better and not specifying the height at all. -
Adding some custom
:focus
state on the interactive elements will be really awesome. -
For the hover state on the bottom, instead of adding padding when hovered, declare it initially to have that padding and
border-radius
, then when you hover, you could just transition thebackground-color
. This way, there will be no pushing effect.
Agata already mentioned above key points which is awesome.
But still, good job on this^
1@diegocarhuavilcaPosted over 3 years ago@pikamart thanks you so much for the feedback that help me a lot !
0 -
- @AgataLiberskaPosted over 3 years ago
Hi @diegocarhuavilca, what issue do you have with the placeholder? Looks ok to me :)
The things I'd have a look at are hover states on the social media icons (which could also be links in my opinion) - the entire page moves around because a lot of padding is added on hover, and the position of the error message, I think it should be just below the input on mobile (it's below the button now) and it's not aligned with the input on some larger screens.
Hope this helps :)
1
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord