0xdvck• 90
@0xdvck
Posted
- Semantic HTML: Evaluation: The project uses semantic HTML tags like <main>, <section>, and <img> with appropriate alt attributes. However, it could further benefit from using more semantic tags such as <article> for the product card. Improvements: Consider using <article> for the product card and <figure> for images with captions.
- Responsive Design: Evaluation: The layout adapts well to different screen sizes, maintaining a consistent design on mobile and desktop devices. Improvements: No major improvements needed, but ensure testing on various devices and browsers to confirm consistency.
- Code Structure and Readability: Evaluation: The code is generally well-structured, with clear class names and separation of concerns between HTML and CSS. Improvements: Consider organizing CSS into modular files if the project scales. Use BEM (Block Element Modifier) methodology for class naming for better maintainability.
- Design Consistency: Evaluation: The solution closely follows the provided design, ensuring a good visual match. Improvements: Ensure all font sizes, margins, and paddings match the design specifications. Use design tools like Figma or Sketch to measure exact values if necessary.
0
