Design comparison
SolutionDesign
Community feedback
- @ManshiporiyaPosted about 2 months ago
- Semantic HTML: Strengths: The solution uses semantic tags (e.g., <header>, <footer>, <main>), which helps structure the document well. Suggestions: If missing, consider adding tags like <nav> for navigation or <section> for content divisions for better readability and SEO.
- Accessibility: Strengths: Good use of alt text for images and visible focus states. Suggestions: Improve accessibility by ensuring all form elements have labels and testing the site with screen readers. Check color contrast for readability.
- Responsiveness: Strengths: The layout adapts well across most screen sizes. Suggestions: For smaller screens, check for any elements that may look cramped or break the layout. Ensure media queries handle spacing and alignment issues effectively.
- Code Structure and Reusability: Strengths: Code is organized and readable. Suggestions: If applicable, refactor repetitive code into reusable components or functions. Consider using CSS variables for consistency.
- Design Consistency: Strengths: The solution aligns well with the original design. Suggestions: Minor improvements could include more consistent spacing or font sizes to match the design perfectly. Overall, great work! A few tweaks could improve accessibility and responsiveness across devices. Keep it up!
0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord