Design comparison
SolutionDesign
Solution retrospective
What are you most proud of, and what would you do differently next time?
The next code:
article:hover {
-webkit-box-shadow: 15px 15px 0px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75);
-moz-box-shadow: 15px 15px 0px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75);
box-shadow: 15px 15px 0px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75);
}
footer h2 {
font-size: 0.8rem;
color: #1b1b1b;
font-weight: 700;
transition: all 0.3s ease-in-out;
}
footer a:hover > h2 {
color: #f6d050;
}
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?
None
What specific areas of your project would you like help with?None
Community feedback
- @NullishKoalaPosted 7 months ago
The solution code looks very good, the html is well structured. For accessibility it has 1 h1 and well divided sections, images have alt atributes. The desktop layout could be a bit bigger, there are some differences between the project and the original design: in spacing between text elements, card's border colour, image padding and card's padding.
Marked as helpful0
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord