Design comparison
Solution retrospective
This challenge seemed hard without the figma files. And that pushed me to creating a figma account and check the challenge files there. Doing that for like 1 hour taught me indirectly the basic use of Figma and the fundementals!
What challenges did you encounter, and how did you overcome them?I had some thinking about the shadow of the container. I got an idea of making another div and making it position: absolute; so I can place it in the right place. But that didn't work out, but then I realized how easy it was to just use box-shadow.
Community feedback
- @grace-snowPosted 2 months ago
You need to pick up some important learnings from this. Make sure you refactor before moving on to anything else.
- it's better for performance to link fonts in the html head instead of css imports.
- move your css to its own file and link in the head of the html.
- wrap this component in a
main
landmark. It's not strictly necessary in a component demo page like this but a good habit to get into now so you don't forget later. Every page needs one main landmark element. - if adding the main image as an inline svg instead of img element I assume you consider it to be a decorative image (not communicating anything). If so this definitely needs
aria-hidden="true" focusable="false"
. If you think it's important content reference it in an img tag instead and give it a meaningful alt description. - text should never be in divs or spans alone really. Use a meaningful element (even paragraph).
- there is one crucially important element missing from this. This component is meant to have a function (purpose). It's meant to signpost users to a blog article. Did you also notice the hover style in the design? These things tell you there must be an interactive element in the component! The heading must have a link inside it wrapping the text of the blog title.
- to make the whole card clickable you can then add a pseudo element to the link, make the card position relative and make the pseudo position absolute and sized to cover the card. Now the link will cover the whole thing making it all clickable.
- is "avatar" a meaningful description of that image? I suggest you read the posts in discord resources channel about how and when to write good alt text.
- get into the habit of including a full modern css reset at the start of the styles in every project. Andy Bell or Josh Comeau both have good ones you can look up and use.
- don't limit the height of elements that contain text, including the body. Remove the height 100vh and use min-height 100svh instead. That allows the body to extend beyond the height of the screen when necessary (e.g. On mobile landscape).
- the card must not have a width. Set a max width in rem instead. This allows the card to shrink narrower when necessary. (E.g. On small phones)
- you rally must not nest css selectors as you are doing currently. It's increasing css specificity and will lead to horrible impossible to manage css once you reach larger projects. Stick to single class selectors as much as possible.
- font size shouldn't ever be in px. Use rem so that user text size settings are honoured.
- there is no need for a media query in this. Once you make the changes above you'll be able to remove it. But for future reference, style mobile first and use min-width media queries defined in rem or em not px. This will make layouts more robust and adapt correctly even when users have different text size settings.
- make sure you check your solution on smaller screens (eg 320px x 256px) and test with a keyboard. These will help you be more sure solutions are likely to be accessible. This currently hits my screen on the sides so make sure there is always some space there like shown in the design.
Marked as helpful0 - @grace-snowPosted 2 months ago
You need to pick up some important learnings from this. Make sure you refactor before moving on to anything else.
- it's better for performance to link fonts in the html head instead of css imports.
- move your css to its own file and link in the head of the html.
- wrap this component in a
main
landmark. It's not strictly necessary in a component demo page like this but a good habit to get into now so you don't forget later. Every page needs one main landmark element.
1@iyedooPosted 2 months ago@grace-snow Thanks! I will try applying those in my next projects! I am actually used to "overuse" <div> and now it became a habit.
0 - @RealKendprPosted 2 months ago
Hey its a great solution you got. Here are some things I can suggest:
- Avoid jumping to using
<h2/>
tags if there is no<h1/>
tag or a possible way to have it.- Using headings in a page should always start with
<h1/>
- and there should always be one
<h1/>
tag per page
- Using headings in a page should always start with
- You can try using an external stylesheet
- It is a file with and extension of
.css
- can be included with the
<link/>
tag
- It is a file with and extension of
1@grace-snowPosted 2 months ago@RealKendpr I'm gonna disagree with you there I'm afraid. This isn't a full Web page. It's a demo of a component. There should be no h1 in this card because it would never be used as the main heading component on a page. It's purpose is to signpost to a blog on another page. When used in a site this component would most likely sit alongside many others exactly the same pointing to different articles. So a h2 is a great heading level to use here.
Marked as helpful1@RealKendprPosted 2 months ago@grace-snow Thats what also hit my mind when writing the comment so I agree with you, but my point is just to start with an
<h1/>
tag in a document. I wasnt pointing in the component directly. Thank you for making that clear.1@iyedooPosted 2 months ago@RealKendpr I appreciate the feedback expecially the second one. I will try using a seperate file for css to make the source code more readable. But for the second one I thought that h2 suited the font size of the text without any css modification. So I decided that it was intended to be an h2
Thanks anyways!
0@RealKendprPosted about 2 months ago@iyedoo
I thought that h2 suited the font size of the text without any css modification.
Yeah that too, you should not chose a heading because of its appearance/size, if you want it big or smaller you should use css. I was doing the same thing when I started.
1 - Avoid jumping to using
Please log in to post a comment
Log in with GitHubJoin our Discord community
Join thousands of Frontend Mentor community members taking the challenges, sharing resources, helping each other, and chatting about all things front-end!
Join our Discord