Article preview component

Community feedback

• 

  A1ex•500

  @a1excpunkPosted almost 3 years ago

  Pixel perfect is kinda "not a good idea" with responsiveness because your work won't be seen on the same dimension devices so if the user misses that "sweet spot" everything scrambles. Plus, you tried pixel perfect with "responsive" units like % and rem, if you want to make pixel perfect work it's a better idea to make it static for both, desktop and mobile versions.

  Marked as helpful

  1

  ---

  

  Mubeen Shaikh•160

  @MubeenAhmadShaikhPosted over 2 years ago

  @a1excpunk Exactly in the start when I started the challenges I didn't used it but looking on the community feedbacks I thought I should give it a shot. It takes more time actually to make it look like exact and its not even responsive on some of the screens. will keep a note of it, Thanks.

  1

  

  A1ex•500

  @a1excpunkPosted over 2 years ago

  @MubeenAhmadShaikh yeah to make it exactly the same might work for static pages, but responsiveness now is a huge deal, because of the variety of screen sizes.

  although it can be a good challenge to do pixel-perfect, it won't be a real-life experience, (in most cases) and I know that it's really hard to make it pixel-perfect.

  one piece of advice, if you choose to do pixel-perfect use px, for responsive %, rem, em.

  and of course, keep practising, that's the most valuable thing you gonna do in programming, for any side front or back.

  0