P
newtothis90• 240
@newtothis90
Posted
IN THIS INSTANCE, there's no need to give your <img> a class name at all since you are already using img{}. Giving it a class isn't wrong at all, but a little less code with not giving them a class.
Hope this helps somewhat. If you have a reason for giving them a class of .image, please explain. I would love to hear your opinion.
Regardless, GREAT JOB!
0
P
Jacó Apolinario• 210
@Jacoappolinario
Posted
@newtothis90 For the sake of visual organization of my code I prefer to leave it like this. I could call the img {}, but visually it wouldn't be so cool, so I'd rather create another new class name haha. But it does make sense what you said, in this case it's more about personal taste and structure, but thanks for the feedback.
1
